———
Dear Dadpop,
So I have this idea. I am imagining I have the run of a small theatre’s lobby for a year. By painting, papering, drawing and writing, gluing, designing, pasting, and adding on its walls, I imagine that after a year, after many shows and many patrons walking in and through, the theatre lobby will be one square meter smaller, its walls containing all the ideas, all over each other, wrapping from the interior, like the reverse of wrapping yarn around a ball. The ideas become architecture. If I were to do a design, it would look like this:
|
My question: if the lobby were
10 square meters
15 square meters
or
20 square meters
for each of these scenarios, what would be
the thickness of my “tapestry” have to be,
to take away 1 square meter total?
Let’s assume the door is 60 cm. wide.
can you calculate that?
love and appreciation from,
your troublesome second daughter
|
———
The “lost area” figures you are requesting are a function of perimeter. The lost area is the product of perimeter and the thickness of your tapestry. Thus area alone is insufficient data.
For example, at 20 sq meters, if your room is 10×2 meters, the perimeter is 10+2+10+2 or
24 and the lost area 24 times the thickness of your tapestry. If the room was instead 40×1/2 meters, the perimeter is 40+40+1/2 +1/2=8 1and the lost area is 81 times the thickness of your tapestry. Obviously, the long skinny room would result in a thinner layer to make up 1 sq meter lost. I need width and length to do the calculations.
Dad
———
hi again,
the estimated width of the room is 3 meters and the length 5 meters, can
you figure it out now? Right nOW!!!! before you get on your plane? My proposal is due on Thursday! thank you so very much,
xx
———
If the room you have in the theatre lobby is 3 x 15 meters, the total area is 3×5=15m2.The net length of the tapestry is 2x(3+5-2t)= (16 – 4t) m, where t is thickness of the the tapestry and reduction is made for corner overlap.
The lost area (you want 1 sqm) is the net length x t = (16-4t)t or 16t-4 t squared.
At lost area equal to 1 sqm, 16t-4tsq = 1. Simplifying to 16t-4tsq-1=0. Dividing by 16 yields t-1/4tsq-1/16=0.
Assuming t is small, we can discount 1/4t(sq) as “too small to matter,” then this reduces to t-1/16=0 or t = 1/16 m or .0625m or 6.25cm at 2.54cm/in, that works out in the American system to about 2 1/2
inches. as a check, our estimate of net length is 16t so the lost area should be 16 x . 0625 which equals exactly 1 sq m.
This may be correct.
Dad
This text responds to the call for “makeshift configurations across media.” In Imagined Theatres 04, “we imagine a release.” But surely this imagining is forestalled. Even the title of this piece provokes feelings of close quarters and claustrophobia: the smallness of the world when it shrinks rather than amplifies.
Let’s be clear: “the emergency” is not only the pandemic, but also how this event has made visible so many fractures and heightened levels of criminal negligence, in the United States and elsewhere. The responses have often been hyperbolic, ridiculous – or they would be if images of red-neck militias didn’t go viral. In my world, there is a hyperactive drive towards video streaming and the mania of everyone jogging, as if to keep us all fit for capitalism’s imminent return. We should just stop for a while. Bojana Kunst’s “A letter to the performance artist” writes about the need for imagination and creative practice to be aligned with “caring with the conditions of life for all” (2020). And we must not forget that the virus is biopolitical and that the existential problem of the overheating Earth is still with us.
THE WORLD GETTING SMALLER imagines the theatre as an organic-cybernetic art installation in which the presence of theatre is an accretion growing into its walls. The longer it is there and the more “skin-in-the-game,” the smaller the space becomes. The references to our situation are seen in the mathematical framing of the piece: one thing leads to another and space is thickened and flattened. Such a theatre might function like a democracy wall: paste on the ideas – the more the better – then gather the people and debate!
Democracy Wall? 14 Street Union Square subway December 2, 2016. Photo: Peter Eckersall
But one can’t be too sure. The times are not democratic. I think of August Strindberg’s dystopian morality play, A Dream Play (1901), in which Agnes, the daughter of the God Indra, visits Earth to see the extent of human suffering with her own eyes. In a scene with an impoverished Lawyer and a woman named Kristine, Agnes experiences first-hand how poverty and suffering defeat all attempts to keep the darkness at bay. Kristine is seen trying to paste over the gaps in the window frame of the rickety Lawyer’s office:
DAUGHTER: Poor, poor human beings! And this pasting! (She bows her head in silent despair)
KRISTINE: I’m pasting. I’m pasting. (1981: 229)
Like A Dream Play, THE WORLD GETTING SMALLER is about the monotony of pasting: the accretion of layers equals the shrinking of space. The text includes an urgent request to the writer’s mathematically inclined father to solve the equation of space: “Right nOW!!!! before you get on your plane.” The speedy-slow of now, ideas seeping into walls and thickening, the insistence on immediate production – all intensifications. The piece draws our attention to how so many things are made as the outcome of the need to keep busy – and maybe these things don’t always help.
More distance, more space, less pasting over the cracks.
References cited
Bojana Kunst, ‘Lockdown Theatre (2): Beyond the time of the right care: A letter to the performance artist.’ https://neu.schauspielhaus.ch/de/journal/18226/lockdown-theatre-2-beyond-the-time-of-the-right-care-a-letter-to-the-performance-artist. Accessed May 13, 2020.
August Strindberg, Five Plays. Translated by Harry G. Carlson. University of California Press. 1981.