She calls them to her, conferral, you do not know what is going on
there is code and negotiation
How will you begin?
Woman with big silver chains over a lilac patterned blouse gestures
man speaks low, tie straight down and sharp
bewildered clients stare straight ahead
Was the performance in line with or a departure
from what you experienced?
he pressed down there, and over, the muscles strain
liquid darker this hurts, he does not care and presses, inches
note the finger down and into tender
my breasts mine again now really
spots sore inside bruises
not for any hospital
telephone chains, survivor language, note to speak note
police station marble floor echoes when I make my report.
How will you live now?
No. I did not ask
my breast felt, bruised, squeezed hard
fibers spring out of their sockets
shape new contours.
Body I do not know
Naked. My wheelchair outside. I can’t run. I am bound
to these words,
my neck bristles, right now, I write down
these glimpses of memory
words I remember dredging up
for the police woman,
the guy at the station, the man in the suit,
How did the site influence your performance?
The prosecutor in the courthouse.
The corridor.
Outside the bathroom,
consultation, ties, high heels.
Tell me what you know about dismemberment.
We sit here, legs crossed. She sits. He sits.
We hear stories of robberies.
Is your client pleading?
What was it like for you to see what you said
through another person’s body?
we wheel into the courthouse and I swat away sensation and the pressure the pressure the blood comes to the surface again, and prickles in my neck hairs upright, and “this is a classic PTSD episode,” she says, watch the light go and go and go and go and No. I say, I know I said that, and I repeat it, and you better listen to me, man tie.
I am pleading to let me out.
I — After another trial has failed, in the midst of mass outrage, I read Petra’s text again, buffeted in analysis. A lawyer grilled on the news: polarizing tempest.
“Was the performance in line with or a departure
from what you experienced?”
Bewildered, survival carries a paradox: “he does not care” versus the violation, the performance, the detail, the injury over time, over an ensemble of times, over an ensemble of iterations.
Testimony is not one act (against assumed impunity),
It is all increments:
the legal report,
the repeating detail,
the scrutiny,
beyond
“Body I do not know” recounts visceral, hair-on-end memory. Dredged memory. Betrayed care. A prevalence of abuse. A reel. Telephone chains, surviving, a language.
II — A costume of professional justice: heels and ties. Sprung embodiments. A small code, a lever against the weight of harm, this mnemonic storm.
Hair on end,
Unwilling repetition.
Delivered:
The cast, the code of figures, the license, the act, the score, the sequence.
Nested in tender enchainments: scenarios of court and theatre, performance and role, decentering “the.” Always.
III — A remember of swatted sensation, liquid rise, the foreground of the felt—the lengthening, repeating dialogue of tides, forces, and fleshy time.
Here an imagined theatre extends a circle of support and confidence, lifting a norm of silence. Performatively and in community, it challenges a siloing of the law to act and the theatre as a hollowing. With testifier’s labor, it circulates the entanglement of words, art and body, the court and theatre, in words dredged with bruises.